Unpublished Disposition, 851 F.2d 361 (9th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 851 F.2d 361 (9th Cir. 1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James W. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-1264.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 13, 1988.Decided June 24, 1988.

Before CHAMBERS, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

James Clark appeals pro se his conviction, following his nolo contendre plea, on two counts of failure to file tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. Clark contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges because the information filed against him did not meet the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4 and 7, and because the Sixteenth Amendment is invalid. He also contends that he should have been prosecuted by indictment rather than by information. Because Clark's plea agreement failed to reserve any issues for appeal, this court's review is limited to his claims that attack the jurisdiction of the district court. See United States v. Travis, 735 F.2d 1129, 1131 (9th Cir. 1984). Therefore we do not review Clark's claim that the district court judge was biased against him.

Clark's jurisdictional contentions are meritless. First, Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(a) provides that a misdemeanor may be prosecuted by indictment or by information. Violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 is a misdemeanor. Second, the information was valid. There is no requirement that an information be verified, and a defendant charged by information is not entitled to a hearing on probable cause when the information is filed. See United States v. Pickard, 207 F.2d 472, 474-75 (9th Cir. 1953). The summons was issued upon a showing of probable cause which complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(a) and 9. Clark's contention that the summons should not have been issued without a prior determination of probable cause lacks merit because he was at liberty until the conclusion of the criminal proceedings against him. See United States v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 637 F.2d 1248, 1252-53 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 (1981). Finally, Clark's contention that the Sixteenth Amendment was not properly ratified has recently been rejected by this court. See United States v. Stahl, 792 F.2d 1438, 1441 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 107 S. Ct. 888 (1987).

AFFIRMED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.