Robert Holley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Amanda Bull, Public Defender; Bradford Peabody, Publicdefender; Edwin A. Wenck, State's Attorney; Kurt A.schmoke, State's Attorney; Ross & Angeletti, Circuit Courtjudges; Gilbert, Bloom and Karwacki, Court of Specialappeals Judges, Defendants-appellees, 851 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 851 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: May 31, 1988. Decided: July 11, 1988

Robert Holley, appellant pro se.

Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Robert Holley appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages and injunctive relief against certain members of the Maryland public defender's office, the state's attorney's office for Baltimore City, two judges of a Maryland trial court, and three judges of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion and order discloses that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant appellant's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, treat as moot appellant's motion for summary disposition of his appeal, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Bull, C/A No. JH-87-1125 (D. Md. May 27, 1987). Because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process, we dispense with argument pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Loc.R. 34(a).

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.