United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Roy, Defendant-appellant, 850 F.2d 690 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 850 F.2d 690 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: April 21, 1988. Decided: June 20, 1988

Michael Roy, appellant pro se.

J. Phillip Krajewski (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Roy, C/A No. 87-251-N; CR No. 85-156-N (E.D. Va. July 14, 1987). We decline to address whether Roy's sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 2 violated the terms of his plea agreement or whether the sentencing court violated the provisions of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579 et seq., as these issues were raised for the first time on appeal. Roy's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.