Sheila A. Baskerville, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections (division Ofparole & Probation), Defendant-appellee, 848 F.2d 184 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseSheila A. Baskerville, appellant pro se.
Stuart Milton Nathan, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN AND ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and district court's order discloses that this appeal from the court's judgment denying relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, is without merit. We accordingly affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Baskerville v. Department of Public Safety, C/A No. 84-12 (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
