Karen Denise Dickens, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rocky Mount Mills, Defendant-appellee, 848 F.2d 184 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseKaren Denise Dickens, appellant pro se.
Marshall Aubrey Gallop, Jr., Battle, Winslow, Scott & Wiley, PA, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 et seq. is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Dickens v. Rocky Mount Mills, C/A No. 87-326-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
