Seawinds, Ltd., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.v.; Royal Nedlloyd Group, N.v.; Knsmlines, B.v.; American President Companies, Ltd.; Americanpresident Lines, Ltd. Sea-land Corporation; Sea-landservice, Inc.; Dampskibsselskabet Af 1912 A/s; A/sdampskibsselskabet Svendborg; A.p. Moller-maersk Line;hapag-lloyd Aktiengesellschaft; Intercontinental Transport(ict) B.v., Defendants-appellees, 846 F.2d 586 (9th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 846 F.2d 586 (9th Cir. 1988) Argued and Submitted April 14, 1988. Decided May 16, 1988

Thomas R. Fahrner, Michele C. Jackson, Michael R. Hudson (Furth, Fahrner, Bluemle & Mason), San Francisco, Cal., for Seawinds, Ltd.

M. Laurence Popofsky, Peter A. Wald, Andrea G. Asaro (Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe) and Charles S. Donovan (Walsh, Donovan, Lindh & Keech), San Francisco, Cal., for Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., Royal Nedlloyd Group, N.V. and KNSM Lines, B.V.

William I. Edlund, Walter R. Allan, John F. McLean (Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro), San Francisco, Cal., for American President Companies, Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.

Terry M. Gordon (Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter), San Francisco, Cal., and Robert S. Zuckerman, for Sea-Land Service, Inc.

Stanley O. Sher, Marc J. Fink, Kelly A. Knight (Dow, Lohnes & Albertson), Washington, D.C., and Gary S. Anderson (Farella, Braun & Martel), San Francisco, Cal., for A.P. Moller-Maersk Line, Hapag-Lloyd A.G., Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 A/S and A/S Dampskibsselskabet Svenborg.

Nathan Lane III, Ralph M. Pais, James B. Nebel (Graham & James), San Francisco, Cal., for Intercontinental Transport (ICT) B.V.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion. See Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 80 B.R. 181 (N.D. Cal. 1987).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.