Hilton Lawrence Brown, Petitioner-appellant, v. Administrative Law Judge, Respondent-appellee, 843 F.2d 1386 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 843 F.2d 1386 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: Jan. 29, 1988. Decided: April 5, 1988

Hilton Lawrence Brown, appellant pro se.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Though his notice of appeal is difficult to decipher, it appears that Hilton Brown seeks to appeal from the order of the Maryland district court transferring his habeas corpus petition to the Central District of California where Brown was convicted and is incarcerated. The transfer order was apparently entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and, therefore, we have jurisdiction to review the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925 (4th Cir. 1986). Generally, habeas corpus petitions must be brought either in the state of confinement or the state where the contested conviction was rendered. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). We, therefore, affirm the order of the district court because it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Brown's petition. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.