Unpublished Dispositionduane R. Sharrar, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dale Foltz, Respondent-appellee, 842 F.2d 333 (6th Cir. 1988)

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Petitioner brought this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he attacked the constitutionality of a 1981 Michigan conviction for second degree criminal sexual conduct. The district court ultimately denied the relief sought and dismissed the petition. This appeal followed. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues, petitioner proceeding pro se.

Upon consideration we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's memorandum opinion and order filed April 30, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.