Unpublished Dispositioncharles R. Crable, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., Defendant-appellee, 842 F.2d 330 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 842 F.2d 330 (6th Cir. 1988) March 25, 1988

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The plaintiff appeals from the district court's February 16, 1988 order reopening discovery in this employment discrimination action.

A judgment is final for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 "when it terminates all issues presented in the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing to be done except enforce by execution what has been determined." Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 434 F.2d 619, 620 (6th Cir. 1970) (per curiam). Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an order disposing of fewer than all the parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101 (6th Cir. 1978) (per curiam); Oak Construction Co. v. Huron Cement Co., 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir. 1978) (per curiam). The district court's order of February 16, 1988 was neither final nor certified for interlocutory appeal. Therefore,

It is ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Rule 9(b) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.