Unpublished Dispositionhattie Raye, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mr. & Mrs. William Selnick; Ro Dunn; Bill Pohlman,defendants-appellees, 838 F.2d 1215 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 838 F.2d 1215 (6th Cir. 1988) Feb. 11, 1988

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, NATHANIEL R. JONES and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Plaintiff filed this civil rights action (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against four individuals alleging, in a conclusionary fashion, rent overcharges, mail tampering, and other harassment. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). This appeal followed. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues, all litigants proceeding pro se.

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order of May 18, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.