Pierre D. Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Frederick Hotchkiss; Dep. Atkins; Sgt. Price, Defendants-appellees,richmond City Jail, Defendant, 829 F.2d 37 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CasePierre D. Williams, appellant pro se.
James Walter Hopper, Gardner, Moss and Hopper, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny appellant's motion for discovery and inspection, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Hotchkiss, C/A No. 86-477-N (E.D. Va., March 31, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
