Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan, Defendant-appellant, 825 F.2d 408 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJoseph Edward Lee Sullivan, appellant pro se.
Justin W. Williams, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before RUSSELL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Sullivan, CR No. 76-233-A; C/A No. 87-0194-AM (E.D. Va., Jan. 13, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Sullivan has moved for correction of a supplement to the record filed in this Court on May 15, 1987. This supplement, although designated as Sullivan's presentence investigation report actually consists of a December 20, 1986, letter from Sullivan to the district court specifying his objections to the presentence report and enclosing material in support of those objections
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
