Jack S. Hart, Sr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Jerry Hedrick, Respondent-appellee.jack S. Hart, Sr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Jerry Hedrick, Respondent-appellee, 825 F.2d 406 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJack S. Hart, Sr., appellant pro se.
Before RUSSELL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the records and the district court's orders discloses that these appeals from orders denying Hart's motions to proceed in forma pauperis are without merit.
Because the procedures followed by the district court comported with this Court's decision in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss these appeals. We note, though, that the district court's dispositions are without prejudice. Hart is free to start the process over if he so chooses.
We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
