Charles Witherspoon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. W.r. Grace & Co., Defendant-appellee, 818 F.2d 862 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore WILKINS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Charles Witherspoon, appellant pro se.
Stanley Mazaroff, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order granting summary judgment to the defendant in this diversity action is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the district court's reasoning that Maryland law does not provide a tort cause of action for retaliatory discharge to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Witherspoon v. W. R. Grace & Co., C/A No. 84-3739 (E.D. Va., Sept. 30, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
