Unpublished Dispositionwilliam Walker, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard Heideman and Frank Coryell, Defendants-appellees, 816 F.2d 683 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 816 F.2d 683 (6th Cir. 1987) April 23, 1987

Before MERRITT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff's appeal from the district court's order denying reconsideration under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, of its order dismissing Plaintiff's civil rights complaint. The matter has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. upon examination of the certified record and the parties' briefs, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 9(b) (3).

Plaintiff alleged in the district court that defendants conspired to maliciously prosecute him and deprive him of his property without due process of law. The district court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction because the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of civil Procedure, was overruled.

Upon consideration, this Court affirms the district court's order denying reconsideration for reasons stated in the district court's order dated July 24, 1986 and order dismissing the action dated February 11, 1986. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.