United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Rosa M. Rodriquez, Defendant-appellant, 807 F.2d 175 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseBefore PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Rosa M. Rodriquez, appellant pro se.
Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order affirming Rosa M. Rodriquez's conviction of drunk driving pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 13 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issue has recently been decided authoritatively, United States v. Walker, 552 F.2d 566 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 848 (1977) (see also United States v. Mariea, 795 F.2d 1094 (1st Cir. 1986)), we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rodriquez, CR No. 86-84 (D.S.C., June 24, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
