Sterling Thornton-bey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Majorie A. Jennings, Commissioner; Att Renbaum, (lynnecitrenbaum Rose), Hearing Examiner; Janet Q.bacon, Administrator; William J.kunkel; Jimmy Chestnut,defendants-appellees, 806 F.2d 258 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 806 F.2d 258 (4th Cir. 1986)

Submitted Aug. 29, 1986. Decided Nov. 24, 1986


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (C/A 84-132-JH)

Sterling Thornton-Bey, appellant pro se.

Stephen Howard Sachs, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bey v. Jennings, C/A 84-132-JH (D. Md., May 30, 1986).

AFFIRMED.