In Re Sports Accessories, Inc.; Alison Knitting &manufacturing, Inc., Debtors.charles A. Docter, Trustee of Sports Accessories, Inc. Andalison Knitting & Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Alvin I. Brown; American Security Bank, N.a., Acorporation, Defendants- Appellees.in Re Sports Accessories, Inc.; Alison Knitting &manufacturing, Inc., Debtors,charles A. Docter, Trustee of Sports Accessories, Inc. Andalison Knitting & Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alvin I. Brown, Defendant-appellant,american Security Bank, N.a., a Corporation, Defendant-appellee.in Re Sports Accessories, Inc; Alison Knitting &manufacturing, Inc., Debtors,charles A. Docter, Trustee of Sports Accessories, Inc. Andalison Knitting & Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. American Security Bank, N.a., a Corporation, Defendant-appellant,alvin I. Brown, Defendant-appellee, 805 F.2d 393 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 805 F.2d 393 (4th Cir. 1986) Submitted Aug. 22, 1986. Decided Nov. 14, 1986

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, District Judge. C/A Nos. 83-1205, 83-1206)

Edward L. Genn, Brown, Genn, Brown & Karp, for Charles A. Docter.

Judith Diane O'Neill, William Kenneth Meyer, Weinberg & Green, for Alvin I. Brown.

Dorothy Sellers, Douglas Bennett Mishkin, Daniel Mark Litt, Melrod, Redman & Gartland, for American Security Bank, N.A.

D. Md.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Before us are appellees/cross appellants' motions to dismiss this appeal of the district court's memorandum and order of 6 May 1986. The order appealed from does not dispose of all the claims or all of the parties within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). The order is not, therefore, final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In the absence of certification by the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b),*  and until such time as the district judge directs the entry of judgment, we have no jurisdiction to review the order. A final judgment is a decision by the district court that "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). Because the litigation is ongoing in this case, we grant the motions and dismiss the appeal in No. 86-2575.

The case is now in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland pursuant to the district court's reference order of 6 May 1986. Reference orders, just as orders denying withdrawal of reference to a bankruptcy judge, are not immediately appealable. In Re Kemble, 776 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1985); In Re King Memorial Hospital, Inc., 767 F.2d 1508 (11 Cir. 1985); In Re Dalton, 733 F.2d 710 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 105 S. Ct. 947 (1985). See also, In Re Riggsby, 745 F.2d 1153 (7th Cir. 1984) (district court order remanding for significant further proceedings in bankruptcy court not immediately appealable). If a party wishes to appeal a decision of the bankruptcy court, it may appeal to the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). A final decision of the district court disposing of that appeal may then be appealed to this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

Each of the appellees/cross-appellants have challenged the district court's denial of sanctions in the 6 May 1986 memorandum and order; these cross-appeals are also premature. The cross-appeals, Nos. 86-2580 and 86-2581, are dismissed.

Because the dispositive issue recently has been authoritatively decided, we dispense with oral argument.

DISMISSED.

 *

The district judge explicitly refused to "render final and appealable" the memorandum and order of 6 May 1986 by certifying it under this Rule