Clifford E. Reavis, Appellant, v. Winston-salem Board of Alcoholic Control; Lewis Cutright,individually & in His Official Capacity As Theadministrator of the Winston-salem Boardof Alcoholic Control, Appellees, 802 F.2d 451 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseClifford E. Reavis, appellant pro se.
Roddey M. Ligon, Jr., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a) (3) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Reavis v. Winston-Salem Bd. of Alcoholic Control, C/A No. 82-1116 (M.D.N.C., June 6, 1985).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
