William Scarborough, Appellant, v. Sebastian Valenti (warden), Appellee, 801 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 801 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1986)

Submitted June 19, 1986. Decided Sept. 16, 1986


William Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General's Office, and Jillyn K. Schulze, Attorney General's Office, for appellee.

D. Md.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Scarborough v. Valenti, C/A No. Y-84-4387 (D. Md., Jan. 30, 1986).

DISMISSED