Spiros Andrea Prokopis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James P. Tinney, Iii, Warden, Maryland Correctionalinstitution, Defendant-appellee, 801 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 801 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1986) Submitted Aug. 27, 1986. Decided Sept. 23, 1986

Spiros Andrea Prokopis, appellant pro se.

Stephen Rosenbaum, Stephen Howard Sachs, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.

D. Md.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Spiros Andrea Prokopis seeks to appeal the order of the district court dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Judgment was entered on June 7, 1983; however, Prokopis did not file his notice of appeal until May 1, 1986. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1), notice of appeal in a civil action must be filed in district court within thirty days from the entry of judgment. Upon a showing of excusable neglect, the district court may extend the time for filing an additional thirty days. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). However, after the expiration of the sixty-day period, neither this Court nor the district court may grant a further extension of time. Townsend v. Maryland, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 835 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 850 (1976); Hensley v. Chesapeake & 0. Ry. Co., 651 F.2d 226, 228 (4th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this appeal as Prokopis filed his notice of appeal well after the permissible sixty-day period.

Because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, grant the appellee's motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.