United States of America, Appellee, v. Priscilla Scarborough, Appellant, 800 F.2d 261 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CasePriscilla Scarborough, appellant pro se.
James R. Spencer, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying the motions for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and for a late appeal is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Scarborough, Cr. No. 85-55-01-R (E.D. Va., Mar. 3, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
