Sunset Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v. B & B Coal Company, Inc., Ambrose Branch Coal Company, Inc.,cecil W. Bolling (jack), Appellees.sunset Enterprises, Inc., Appellee, v. B & B Coal Company, Inc., Ambrose Branch Coal Company Inc.,cecil W. Bolling (jack), Appellants, 798 F.2d 1409 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 798 F.2d 1409 (4th Cir. 1986) Argued June 2, 1986. Decided Aug. 14, 1986

Fred M. Leonard (Robert T. Copeland; Copeland, Molinary & Bieger; Michael A. Bragg on brief), for appellants.

Hugh P. Cline (Cline, McAfee and Adkins on brief), for appellee.

W.D. Va., 38 B.R. 712.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Sunset Enterprises, Inc, (Sunset), a debtor in bankruptcy, appeals the district court's ruling that certain loan payments made by Sunset to B & B Coal Company, Inc. (B & B), between ninety days and one year before bankruptcy, were not avoidable preferences under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 5 547(b) (4) (B) (1982 & Supp. II 1984) . B & B cross appeals the court's ruling that certain other payments made within ninety days of bankruptcy were avoidable preferences under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) (4) (A).

We have reviewed the record, briefs and oral argument. Although we might have expressed it somewhat differently, we conclude that the district court has adequately stated our position on this case. We, therefore, affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sunset Enterprises, Inc. v. B & B Coal, Inc., No. 83-0257-B (W.D. Va. May 17, 1985).

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.