Unpublished Dispositionjames Holtvluwer, Plaintiff-appellant,vs.the Lee Apparel Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 787 F.2d 590 (6th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 787 F.2d 590 (6th Cir. 1986) 3/26/86

AFFIRMED

W.D. Mich.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: ENGEL, CONTIE and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


James Holtvluwer, plaintiff, appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing his action predicated on contract and tort theories arising out of his discharge by defendant, The Lee Apparel Company. Holtvluwer contends that the district court erred in applying Kansas, rather than Michigan, law and in its interpretation of Kansas law.

For the reasons set out in the decision of the district court, we find these assertions unpersuasive.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.