Unpublished Dispositiondorothy Sharp, et al. Plaintiff-appellant,jane Kyser, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Owens Corning Fiberglas, Defendant-appellee, 785 F.2d 310 (6th Cir. 1986)

ORDER

BEFORE: KEITH and GUY, Circuit Judges and TAYLOR, District Judge.^* 

In this employment discrimination action brought under 42 U.S.S. Sec. 1983, plaintiff appeals the denial of a preliminary injunction. The magistrate prepared a report which the district court then reviewed and adopted over plaintiff's objections. The district court reviewed the magistrate's report and recommendation under the 'clearly erroneous' standard.

Title 28, Sec. 636(b) (1) (A) provides that motions for injunctive relief may not be sent to a magistrate for hearing and determination. Injunctive motions may be sent for a report and recommendation, however, the required reivew by the district court is de novo.

It is, therefore, ordered that this case be remanded to the district court for de novo review.