United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William Richard Minor, Defendant-appellant, 783 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 783 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1986) Feb. 18, 1986

Charles C. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

T.J. Pantaleo, Eric S. Engel, Pantaleo & Kudon, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, KENNEDY and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Minor was convicted of violations of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a), 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and 18 U.S.C. § 371. We affirmed, United States v. Minor, 756 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam), but stayed the mandate pending disposition by the Supreme Court of Dowling v. United States, 84-589, involving Minor's co-defendant, Paul Dowling. The Court reversed Dowling's conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, holding the statute does not apply to the interstate transportation of "bootleg" phonorecords manufactured and distributed without the consent of the copyright owners. Dowling v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S. Ct. 3127, 87 L. Ed. 2d 152 (1985). The Court then granted certiorari in this case, vacated our judgment, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Dowling, --- U.S. ----, 106 S. Ct. 401, 88 L. Ed. 2d 353 (1985). On the basis of Dowling, we reverse Minor's conviction for violation of Sec. 2314 (counts 8 and 9). We affirm his conviction on the remaining counts for the reasons stated in our original opinion.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.