Catalytic, Inc., Petitioner, Cross-respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Cross-petitioner, 739 F.2d 540 (11th Cir. 1984)
Annotate this CaseJohn Richard Carrigan, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner, cross-respondent.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, JOHNSON and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States dated April 30, 1984, --- U.S. ----, 104 S. Ct. 2164, 80 L. Ed. 2d 548, vacating the judgment of this Court, 714 F.2d 158, and remanding this case, we REMAND the case to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., 268 NLRB No. 173 (Feb. 22, 1984).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
