Maria Antoineta Plasencia, Petitioner, v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 719 F.2d 1425 (9th Cir. 1983)
Annotate this CaseDenis W. Campbell, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
C. William Kircher, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Robert Firth, Judge.
Before WALLACE and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges and CORDOVA,* District Judge.
ORDER
This court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties in the light of the Supreme Court's holding that the respondent was entitled to due process as a permanent resident alien and the Supreme Court's remand to determine whether due process was accorded under all the circumstances. See Landon v. Plasencia, --- U.S. ----, 103 S. Ct. 321, 332, 74 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1982). We conclude that the case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's opinion.
It is so ordered.
Honorable Valdemar A. Cordova, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
