Edward R. Vauls, Petitioner, v. Veterans Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, Andunited States of America, Respondents, 693 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
Annotate this CaseJames R. Rosa and Mitchell J. Notis, Washington, D.C., on brief for petitioner.
Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty. and Royce C. Lamberth, R. Craig Lawrence, Michael J. Ryan, and Regina C. McGranery, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., on brief for respondent. Alan F. Greenwald and Evangeline W. Swift, Attys., Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C., entered appearances for respondent.
Before WRIGHT, WILKEY, and WALD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion for the court per curiam.
PER CURIAM:
We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Hayes v. United States Government Printing Office, 684 F.2d 137 (D.C. Cir. 1982), Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir. 1982), Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), and Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving claims of both discrimination and improper agency action must be brought as one action in the District Court. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over the petition, and it is therefore dismissed.
So ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
