United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Denise Brown, Defendant-appellant.in Re Richard A. Hamar, 557 F.2d 226 (9th Cir. 1977)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 557 F.2d 226 (9th Cir. 1977) June 27, 1977

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


Order Assessing Penalty

Richard A. Hamar, counsel who commenced the appeal, is assessed a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00), to be paid into the Registry of the Clerk of this Court within 28 days from the date of the filing of this order for failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence.

The penalty is assessed under Rule 46(c), F.R.App.P. There are extenuating circumstances, but he should not have excused himself from "protecting the record."

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.