United States of America v. Gabriel Francis Antelope, Appellant, 555 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1977)
Annotate this CaseAllen V. Bowles, Moscow, Idaho, argued for appellant.
Gabriel Francis Antelope, pro se.
Marion J. Callister, U.S. Atty., Mikel H. Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty., D. Idaho, Boise, Idaho, argued for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court, District of Idaho; J. Blaine Anderson, Judge.
Before KILKENNY, CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
The facts leading up to the appellant's trial and conviction are stated in our opinion, United States v. Antelope, 523 F.2d 400 (CA9 1975). That decision was reversed by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Antelope, --- U.S. ----, 97 S. Ct. 1395, 51 L. Ed. 2d 701 (1977), the cause remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.
Inasmuch as the Supreme Court rejected appellant's sole contention, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
