United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Roy Mandujano, Defendant-appellee, 539 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1976)
Annotate this CaseWilliam S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., John Pinckney, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Michael Allen Peters, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellee.
Before TUTTLE, COLEMAN, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court of the United States having reversed the judgment of this Court 496 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1974) it now ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the trial court be and the same is reversed and the case is remanded to the District court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ---, 96 S. Ct. 1768, 48 L. Ed. 2d 212.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
