Donald H. Brown, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee, 523 F.2d 365 (8th Cir. 1975)
Annotate this CaseJames Q. Fisher, Encino, Cal., and Joel Kreiner, Hollywood, Cal., for appellant.
Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gilbert E. Andrews, Jonathan S. Cohen and Arthur L. Bailey, Attys., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before VOGEL, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal the appellant-taxpayer contends that the Tax Court erred in denying as a tax deduction for medical expense the cost of Scientology 'processing' for himself and his wife, including transportation for his wife's attendance at the Hubbard College of Scientology in Sussex, England, and in Edinborough, Scotland. We reject appellant's contentions and affirm the judgment of the Tax Court on the basis of its well-reasoned and comprehensive opinion. See Rule 14.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
