National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, and Bartendersand Culinary Workers Union, Intervenor, v. Howard Johnson Company, Respondent, 496 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseElliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Robert V. Magor, Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Before MERRILL, ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The petitioning Board's Decision and Order is reported at 198 NLRB No. 98. It was issued by the full Board, without dissent.
We have carefully reviewed the record. From the record, together with the reported opinion of the full Board, our conclusion is that the Order should be, and therefore will be,
Enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.