United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. John William Bullock et al., Defendants-appellants, 458 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseBefore BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed.1a See Local Rule 21.2a
Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
1a Appellant contended that: 1) the evidence was insufficient for the jury to have inferred the existence of an unlawful agreement; 2) there was improper venue and a lack of jurisdiction; 3) the charge did not sufficiently instruct the jury to consider each defendant separately; and 4) a preliminary instruction to the jury that once there is some evidence of conspiracy, hearsay of co-conspirators may be admissible, amounted to an instruction, as a matter of law, that there was evidence of a conspiracy. We have considered all these specifications of error and find them to be without merit.
2a See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5 Cir. 1970).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
