United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Craig Phillip Coleman, Defendant-appellant, 453 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1972)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 453 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1972) Feb. 15, 1972

Gerard J. Glass (argued), Michael H. Weiss, of Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

John F. Cooney, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Criminal Division, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN,*  Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

At issue is the failure to exhaust an administrative remedy: that is the taking of an appeal on the classification.

The tests of Lockhart [Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)] require affirmance. We cannot find this case within the exception of Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962).

 *

J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.