William N. Grosch, Appellant, v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service,et al., Appellees, 453 F.2d 1337 (4th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseThomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, N. C. (Loflin, Anderson & Loflin, Durham, N. C., on brief), for appellant.
N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (William L. Osteen, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.
Before BRYAN and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges, and YOUNG, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b)1 but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.
Affirmed.
See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233, 89 S. Ct. 414, 21 L. Ed. 2d 402; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460, 90 S. Ct. 661, 24 L. Ed. 2d 653, and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
