Charles D. Boyd, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dr. Charles J. Beto, Director, Texas Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 447 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseJ. Glenn Turner, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.
Charles D. Boyd, pro se.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; William M. Taylor, Jr., Judge.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This habeas corpus proceeding involving a state prisoner raises evidentiary procedural matters which do not rise to the level of substantial federal constitutional questions. The district court was therefore correct in denying relief.
Affirmed.
---------------
* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
