United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Texas Education Agency et al., Katy Independent School District, Defendants-appellees, 443 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir. 1971)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 443 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir. 1971) July 6, 1971

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; James L. Noel, Jr., Judge.

Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Jerris Leonard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph D. Rich, Atty., Civil Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

James McCoy, Austin, Tex., James S. Kelly, F. James Wunderlich, Grant Cook, Houston, Tex., for appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

The order of the district court under review is vacated and the cause is remanded with direction that the district court require the school board forthwith to reconsider the consent decree in the light of the principles established in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 1971, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S. Ct. 1267, 28 L. Ed. 2d 554, insofar as they relate to the issues presented in this case.

The district court is also directed to implement fully the uniform provisions of our decision in Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District (en banc), 5 Cir., 1970, 419 F.2d 1211; Id., 425 F.2d 1211, insofar as said uniform provisions relate to desegregation of faculty and other staff, majority to minority transfer policy, transportation, school construction and site selection, and attendance outside system of residence. See also Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 432 F.2d 875.

The district court shall require the school board to file semiannual reports during the school year similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 611, at 618-619.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Vacated and remanded with direction.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.