National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Drexel Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, 439 F.2d 156 (4th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseDecided April 15, 1971
Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Ronald I. Tish, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and William Wachter, Washington, D. C., Attorney, on the brief), for petitioner.
R. D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Hardy & Crihfield, Greensboro, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the company violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. We enforce the Board's order, which is reported at 180 NLRB No. 46.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
