United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George Haslam, Iii, Appellant, 436 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 436 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971) January 5, 1971

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Warren J. Ferguson, Judge.

David K. Yamakawa, Jr. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Alan H. Friedman (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, George G. Rayborn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

On the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.