The Hertz Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Donald Cox and Sarah C. Crowe, Defendants-appellees, 436 F.2d 1376 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseM. W. Parse, Jr., Leon Jaworski, Stephen D. Susman, Houston, Tex., Donald M. Fain, Atlanta, Ga., John Murray, Morris Wolin, New York City, for appellant; Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel.
Wade C. Hoyt, Jr., of Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Rome, Ga., Boehl, Stopher, Graves & Deindoerfer, A. J. Deindoerfer, Louisville, Ky., for Cox.
James I. Parker, Cedartown, Ga., Harold L. Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., for Crowe; Howe & Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., of counsel.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before WISDOM and DYER, Circuit Judges, and KRENTZMAN, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, 5 Cir., 430 F.2d 1365.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
