Bennie H. Hicks, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee, 427 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseDonald E. Wolfram (argued), of Goodson, Richmond & Rose, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff and appellant.
Robert M. Heier (argued), Morton Hollander, Kathryn H. Baldwin, Reed Johnston, Jr., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward E. Davis, U. S. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court sustaining the Secretary's decision is affirmed.
At best, for Hicks it could be said there was a conflict in the expert medical opinions. We cannot say the Secretary's decision was not supported by substantial evidence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
