National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc., Respondent, 405 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseArnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Roy O. Hoffman, Dir., N. L. R. B., Julius Rosenbaum (argued), Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Laurence P. Corbett (argued), of Corbett & Welden, Berkeley, Cal., Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, BROWNING and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The NLRB seeks enforcement of its order entered respecting respondent as reported at 161 N.L.R.B. No. 133.
While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's finding that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3) and (1), by discriminatorily discharging employee Beverly Marsh to discourage union membership and activity.
Accordingly the Board's order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
