National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Retail Clerks International Association, Local Union No. 899, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents, 404 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseArnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D. C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D. C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith & Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame & Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor, State-Mart, Inc.
Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order entered on July 23, 1967. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 166 N.L.R.B. No. 92. The trial examiner found that respondent union had violated section 8(b) (7) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7) (C), by picketing stores of an unorganized employer for more than 30 days, without filing an election petition and with a proscribed recognitional objective. The Board adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the examiner. We are persuaded that those findings and conclusions are correct.
The order will be enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
