United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Clarence Lothridge, Zorina Barnett, Defendants-appellants, 402 F.2d 454 (6th Cir. 1968)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 402 F.2d 454 (6th Cir. 1968) Dec. 26, 1967, Certiorari Denied Oct. 14, 1968, See 89 S. Ct. 124

Marshall C. Hill, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Kenneth G. McIntyre, Detroit, Mich., (Lawrence Gubow, U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial, of the defendants-appellants under a multiple count indictment charging violations of narcotics statutes. Minimum sentences required by statute were imposed as to each defendant-appellant which are not under attack on this appeal. Additional sentences, in neither case of greater duration than the required minimum just referred to, were imposed under other counts, and it is the convictions under those counts which defendants-appellants here seek to have reviewed. Where a sentence under a count not challenged on appeal is not in excess of sentences imposed under other counts and provided to run concurrently with the former it is unnecessary to consider the validity of such additional convictions on appeal. Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 63 S. Ct. 1375, 87 L. Ed. 1774 (1943); United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 86 S. Ct. 279, 15 L. Ed. 2d 210 (1965); see also Zachary v. United States, 275 F.2d 793 (6th Cir. 1960). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.