Stanley Francis Silva, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 394 F.2d 3 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseMilton W. B. Choy (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
Michael D. Hong (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Yoshimi Hayashi, U. S. Atty., James F. Ventura, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The defendant's in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda-type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post-Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966).
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S. Ct. 1772, 16 L. Ed. 2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
