Michael Doud Gill, Appellant, v. M. E. Miller, Appellee, 393 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseG. Morton Good, Cromwell A. Anderson, Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Martin Greenbaum, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S. Ct. 317, 76 L. Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S. Ct. 416, 67 L. Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S. Ct. 44, 61 L. Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
