Reliance National Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Margaret Hackelman, Appellee, 372 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 372 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. 1967)
January 25, 1967
John R. Faust, Jr., Cake, Jaureguy, Hardy, Buttler & McEwen, Portland Or., for appellant.
Rives & Rogers, W. Michael Gillette, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff (appellee here) had no proof to spare, but we have concluded that there was an issue of fact which the district court could have decided either way. We affirm the judgment against the defendant (appellant) as not clearly erroneous.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
