Henry Monroe, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 359 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseCertiorari Denied June 6, 1966
See 86 S. Ct. 1876
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Robert A. Ainsworth, Judge.
Henry Monroe, pro se.
John C. Ciolino, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louis C. LaCour, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S. Ct. 630, 11 L. Ed. 2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S. Ct. 1068, 10 L. Ed. 2d 148.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
